Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M10, with a general score of 86.2 against 73.5. Motorola Moto G200 5G's construction is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy M10's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto G200 5G has a greater performance than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto G200 5G counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy M10, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2460px resolution, a better pixels number per inch of screen and a little bit larger display.
The Moto G200 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Moto G200 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Moto G200 5G has slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Moto G200 5G features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.