Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is better than the Galaxy M10's 73.5 general score. Although Motorola razr (2020) is newer than Galaxy M10, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has the previous 11 version and Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher pixels quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 876 x 2142px. Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The Motorola razr (2020) features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a much higher resolution camera, a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much higher video resolution and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy M10 features superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.