Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than Galaxy M10, having an 83.8 score against 73.5. The Galaxy A50 design has the same thickness than Galaxy M10, but it's a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a quite larger screen and a better screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M10, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A50 has a superior camera than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.