Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than Galaxy M10, with a score of 86.6 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a a bit heavier device than Galaxy M10, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a bit larger display. Galaxy A50s has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A50s features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 3 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy M10, because it has an 18% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A50s features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.