Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than the Galaxy M10, having a score of 85.5 against 73.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A51's construction is newer, but a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy M10.
The Galaxy A51 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A51 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a little larger screen, a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A51 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera, a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A51 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy M10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.