Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy M10, getting a 90.8 score against 73.5. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy M10.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy M10, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit larger screen and a better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M10, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.