Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M10, having a overall score of 76.9 against 73.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A70 has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy A70 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater pixels density.
Galaxy M10 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality photos and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution.
The Galaxy A70 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A70 counts with improved battery life than Galaxy M10, because it has a 32 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.