Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Samsung Galaxy M10, having a overall score of 92.9 against 73.5. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is newer than the Samsung Galaxy M10, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a little bit larger display, a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a greater count of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a much better video quality, a lot bigger sensor and a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M10, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.