Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Galaxy M10, having a 90.8 score against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's body is newer than the Galaxy M10's, although it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy M10, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a higher pixels quantity in each screen inch. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments, a way better video quality and a way larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.