Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy M10's general score of 73.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is newer, but a lot heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy M10. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a way greater pixels quantity per screen inch and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy M10, because it has a way higher video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has superior battery performance than Galaxy M10, because it has a 32 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.