Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is way better than the Samsung Galaxy M10, with an 89 score against 73.5. The Galaxy Note10 is a better phone than the Samsung Galaxy M10, we must tell that it is also a just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone. Galaxy Note10 counts with a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a higher display density, a little larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy Note10 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy M10, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.