Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is way better than Galaxy M10's 73.5 global score. Although the Galaxy S10 5G is better than Galaxy M10, we must note that it's also a a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S10 5G has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution, a lot higher pixel amount per inch in the display and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a less MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better captures in low light environments, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 5G features greater battery duration than Galaxy M10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.