Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is better than the Galaxy M10's 73.5 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10e and the Galaxy M10 were released only 1 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is just a little bit lighter but also just a bit thicker than the Galaxy M10. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a sharper screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more internal memory. Galaxy S10e has a greater hardware performance than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy M10 features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 10% greater battery size. Galaxy S10e counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.