Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Samsung Galaxy M10, with a overall score of 98 against 73.5. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy M10. These devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a little bigger screen, a much better count of pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 3200px resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy M10, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy M10, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a much better video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy M10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.