Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Galaxy M10, with a 93.4 score against 73.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has older 13 version and Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a just a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy M10, but they have the same thickness.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way better pixel amount per inch of screen.
Galaxy S22 has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M10, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images, a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy S22 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy M10, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.