Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy M10, with a global score of 95.4 against 73.5. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy M10's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy M10, because it has a way greater pixels count per inch of screen, a little bit bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better performance than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 5 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy M10, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much more mega pixels back camera, a larger aperture and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy M10, because it has a 47 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.