Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-05 | -- |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is way better than Galaxy M10's score of 73.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy M10. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy M10 counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Galaxy M10, because it has a bit larger display, a much higher pixel density and a way better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy M10, because it has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and a much higher video definition.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy M10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.