Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M10's 73.5 general score. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's body is just a little lighter than the Galaxy M10, although it is thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has older 4.4.2 version and Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a much sharper screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot higher display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has less CPU cores and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a higher resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M10 has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.