Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-02-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a little bit better than Galaxy M10, with a global score of 78.1 against 73.5. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S7 edge has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S7 edge body has the same thickness than the Galaxy M10, but it's a little bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M10, because although it has less cpu cores , it also counts with more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a much better display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater screen density.
Galaxy M10 has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M10 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy S7 edge takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger sensor and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy M10, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.