Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M10, getting a global score of 83.3 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy S9 design has the same weight than the Samsung Galaxy M10, but it's a little bit thicker. Galaxy S9 has an incredibly better display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher display density and a much better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M10, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 112 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy M10 features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.