Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy M10's 73.5 global score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and a little thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy M10, although it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better performing processor than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M10, because it has a much greater amount of pixels per display inch, a little bit bigger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M10 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations, a much higher (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.