Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy M10, having an 82.7 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy M10. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M10, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a better count of pixels per display inch and a little bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution, a bigger aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.