Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy M10, having a score of 81.1 against 73.5. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is newer than Samsung Galaxy M10, it's heavier and thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy M10, because it has a better pixels density, a little bit bigger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.