Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Samsung Galaxy M11, with a 93.2 score against 74.8. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than Samsung Galaxy M11. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy M11 has Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M11, because it has a way higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels, a bit larger display and a much higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much more powerful processor than Galaxy M11, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy M11 has a little better battery life than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 15% greater battery capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M11, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.