Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than Samsung Galaxy M11, getting an 88.1 score against 74.8. IPhone X's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy M11, although it was released many years before. IPhone X features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater display pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The iPhone X features a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy M11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Apple iPhone X has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Galaxy M11 counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh. The Apple iPhone X features a much better camera than Galaxy M11, because although it has a camera with less MP resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.