Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is better than the Galaxy M11, having an 84.2 score against 74.8. The Apple iPhone XS construction is thinner and lighter than Galaxy M11, although it was released just 21 months before. The iPhone XS has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy M11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a way higher pixel density.
The Apple iPhone XS has a quite better processing power than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M11 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Apple iPhone XS shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a camera with less megapixels, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M11 has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has an 88% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.