Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy M11's overall score of 74.8. The Google Pixel is an a lot older phone than the Galaxy M11, but it's much lighter and a little thinner anyway. Google Pixel's processor is just as good as Galaxy M11's processing unit, because although the Google Pixel has less cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel has a better display than Galaxy M11, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much better screen pixels density. Google Pixel captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a lower 12.3 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a lot larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Google Pixel features a little bit more storage for apps and games than Galaxy M11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M11 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.