Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M11, getting a global score of 80 against 74.8. The Google Pixel 3 design is much lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M11, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more over a year before. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a way higher screen pixels density. The Google Pixel 3 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy M11 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M11 features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.