Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than Galaxy M11, having a 78.8 score against 74.8. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version while Galaxy M11 has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 3a body is way lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy M11, even though it was released just 13 months before.
The Google Pixel 3a features a sharper display than Galaxy M11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a lot better pixels quantity per screen inch. Galaxy M11 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 3a also has more RAM. Google Pixel 3a captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a less MP resolution camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3a also counts with a bigger camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a much better video quality.
Galaxy M11 has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.