Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy M11's global score of 74.8. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy M11 has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3a XL is older than the Galaxy M11, it's design is lighter and just a little thinner.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit better CPU than Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a better display than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
The Google Pixel 3a XL takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3a XL also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy M11 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M11 counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 35 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.