Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M11, with an 81.9 score against 74.8. The Google Pixel 4 is a lighter and a bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy M11, even when they were released only 7 months apart. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M11, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a way higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy M11 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a way better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M11 features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.