Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M11, getting a global score of 82.9 against 74.8. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M11 has Android 10 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Google Pixel 4a is a a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter device than Samsung Galaxy M11, even though they were released with only a couple months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better camera than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy M11 counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.