Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than the Galaxy M11's general score of 74.8. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy M11, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Galaxy M11 has Android 10 version, giving a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a sharper screen than Galaxy M11, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a lot greater screen pixel density.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy M11 features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a lesser MP back facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a bigger camera aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.