Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than the Galaxy M11's 74.8 global score. Google Pixel 5's construction is lighter and thinner than Galaxy M11, even though both were released with only a couple months difference. Google Pixel 5 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher display pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 5 has a superior camera than Galaxy M11, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a much better video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy M11 features superior battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.