Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M11, having a 77.7 score against 74.8. Despite of the fact HTC One M9 is notably older and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy M11, it's construction is still way lighter. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy M11 has Android 10.
HTC One M9 has a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 3 GB of RAM memory, the HTC One M9 also has an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit. HTC One M9 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
HTC One M9 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera, a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy M11 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M11 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M11 features a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.