Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than the Galaxy M11, having an 82.5 score against 74.8. The LG V30S ThinQ is an a lot older cellphone than the Galaxy M11, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy M11 has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features.
LG V30S ThinQ features a way better looking screen than Galaxy M11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a much higher display density. LG V30S ThinQ has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy M11, because it has a better 16 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger back camera sensor. LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M11 features a much longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.