Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy M11, getting an 81.3 score against 74.8. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than Galaxy M11, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Galaxy M11, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M11, because it has a larger aperture, a way better video definition, a more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M11, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Galaxy M11 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.