Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M11's 74.8 general score. LG Velvet's design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy M11, even though both of them were only released with a couple months difference. LG Velvet has a more vivid screen than Galaxy M11, because it has a much better 1080 x 2460px resolution, a quite bigger display and a higher pixel density.
LG Velvet features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. The LG Velvet features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M11, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M11 features superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. The LG Velvet captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG Velvet also has a way bigger sensor, a lot better video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.