Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy M11's global score of 74.8. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy M11 has Android 10. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body weights the same than Samsung Galaxy M11, but it's just a little thinner.
The Galaxy M11 has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M11, because it has a greater number of pixels per display inch, a little bit bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M11, because it has a camera with way more mega pixels, a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and videos and a larger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy M11 has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.