Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is a bit better than the Galaxy M11, with a overall score of 80.7 against 74.8. Motorola One Vision's body is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy M11, even though it was released about 13 months before. The Motorola One Vision features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One Vision also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a way higher number of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola One Vision captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy M11, because it has a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way more mega-pixels back camera, a lot better (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments.
The Motorola One Vision features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M11, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M11 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.