Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than Samsung Galaxy M11, with an 83.8 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy M11, even though it was released just 15 months before. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a better display than Galaxy M11, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a way greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy A50 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A50 has much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M11 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A50 features a superior camera than Galaxy M11, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with a much better 25 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.