Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than the Galaxy M11's 74.8 global score. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version while Galaxy M11 has Android 10 version. Galaxy A51 5G is a a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Galaxy M11, even when they were only released 1 months apart.
Galaxy A51 5G has a better screen than Galaxy M11, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a lot greater pixel density and a little bit larger display. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M11, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M11 counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.