Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Metallic blue and Violet | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M11's 74.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active design is just a little lighter than the Galaxy M11, but it's thicker and was released many years before. Galaxy M11 and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active have extremely similar CPUs, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot higher display pixels density. Galaxy S7 Active takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M11, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy M11 counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M11 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy M11 features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.