Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| PLS | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy M12's general score of 80. Although iPhone 8 Plus is noticeably older than the Galaxy M12, it's body is a little bit lighter and extremely thinner. Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy M12, because although it has less RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 8 Plus counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy M12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. IPhone 8 Plus counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M12 features a very superior battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy M12 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.