Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| PLS | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than the Galaxy M12, with an 88.1 score against 80. Even though Apple iPhone X is notably older than Galaxy M12, it's design is notably lighter and incredibly thinner. IPhone X has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone X has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a much better amount of pixels per inch of screen. The iPhone X counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M12, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M12 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M12 also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
Galaxy M12 has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.