Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| PLS | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M12's global score of 80. IPhone XR is an extremely older phone than the Galaxy M12, but Apple managed to make it somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The iPhone XR has a better display than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a little bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy M12 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy M12 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Apple iPhone XR has a faster processing unit than Galaxy M12, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Galaxy M12 has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
The Galaxy M12 has a much longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.