Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| PLS | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M12, getting an 81.9 score against 80. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4 is older than Samsung Galaxy M12, it's construction is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 4 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features a more vivid display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a way greater pixels density. Galaxy M12 features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy M12 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy M12 has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 114% more battery capacity. The Galaxy M12 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.