Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| PLS | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M12's general score of 80. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is older than Samsung Galaxy M12, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a way better looking display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a lot higher count of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy M12 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M12 also counts with a much more MP camera.
Galaxy M12 counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M12 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy M12 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 62% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.