Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| PLS | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M12, with an 82.5 score against 80. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is lighter and notably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M12, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy M12 has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater display pixels density and a much better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy M12 has a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy M12 counts with a much longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.