Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-03-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| PLS | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy M12, getting a general score of 81.3 against 80. LG V35 ThinQ is an incredibly older device than the Galaxy M12, but LG was able to make it way thinner and a lot lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a lot higher pixels density. The Galaxy M12 captures clearer photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M12, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M12 has a much better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.